By Richard King
Chinese language and Greco-Roman ethics current hugely articulate perspectives on how one may still dwell; either one of those traditions stay influential in smooth philosophy. The query arises how those traditions could be in comparison with each other. Comparative ethics is a comparatively younger self-discipline; this quantity is an important contribution to the sector. basic questions about the character of evaluating ethics are taken care of in introductory chapters, and center concerns in all of the traditions are addressed: concord, advantage, friendship, wisdom, the relation of ethics to morality, relativism, feelings, being and team spirit, simplicity and complexity, and prediction.
Read or Download How Should One Live?: Comparing Ethics in Ancient China and Greco-Roman Antiquity PDF
Best greek & roman books
Plato and his Predecessors considers how Plato represents his philosophical predecessors in a overdue quartet of dialogues: the Theaetetus, the Sophist, the Politicus and the Philebus. those predecessors look in imaginary conversations; and they're refuted once they fail to shield their philosophical positions in debate.
The connection among Seneca's prose works and his profession as a first-century Roman statesman is frustrating, for whereas he writes within the first individual, he tells little of his exterior lifestyles or of the folk and occasions that shaped its environment. during this e-book, Miriam Griffin addresses the matter by way of first reconstructing Seneca's profession utilizing simply outdoors resources and his de Clementia and Apocolocyntosis.
This ebook consolidates rising study on Aristotle's technological know-how and ethics that allows you to discover the level to which the innovations, equipment, and practices he built for clinical inquiry and clarification are used to enquire ethical phenomena. every one bankruptcy indicates, differently, that Aristotle's ethics is way extra like a technological know-how than it truly is commonly represented.
Additional info for How Should One Live?: Comparing Ethics in Ancient China and Greco-Roman Antiquity
Therefore, to talk about “normative ethics” and “normative relativism” might have been one-sided in the first place. e. a theory which tells us what to do. We should talk about “ethics” and “ethical relativism” (as contrasted with “metaethics” and “metaethical relativism”) instead of “normative ethics” and “normative relativism” to begin with. In order to avoid confusion I am not going to change my terminology now but I intend it to be understood as neutral with respect to the naturalismnonnaturalism debate.
According to the Shuowen (p. 418), the primary verbal meaning of shun is to follow, comply or accord with the inherent patterns of an object or state of affairs. In this sense, it defines shun as li ⧚, patterns or principles, or as a verb, to put things in order or effect a predetermined order; in sculpting a piece of jade, for example, the master craftsman follows its lines or patterns to achieve optimal results. The Guxun huizuan ᬙ㿧ः㑖, edited by Zong Fubang ᅫ⽣䙺, Chen Shinao 䱇Ϫ䧗, and Xiao Haibo 㭁⍋⊶ (Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan, 2003), p.
E. independently of any cultural moral code, is simply unanswerable according to the metaethical relativist – it can be answered neither by using our “intuition” nor in any other way. And the reason why is not mysterious at all. The question what is morally right or wrong “in itself” is as unanswerable as the question whether Big Benn is “in itself” on the right side of the river Thames or on its left – independently of the chosen perspective. It is on the right side if you look from the north, it is on the left side if you look from the south, “in itself” it is neither here nor there.
How Should One Live?: Comparing Ethics in Ancient China and Greco-Roman Antiquity by Richard King