Mark A. Lorell Julia Lowell Obaid Younossi's Evolutionary Acquisition: Implementation Challenges for PDF

By Mark A. Lorell Julia Lowell Obaid Younossi

ISBN-10: 0833038826

ISBN-13: 9780833038821

This monograph offers findings of a RAND undertaking AIR strength learn venture documenting classes discovered via the U.S. Air strength (USAF) and different division of safeguard (DoD) rate research and acquisition group participants from the implementation of evolutionary acquisition (EA)strategies for significant Air strength protection house acquisition courses. In may perhaps 2003, DoD mandated EA concepts hoping on spiral improvement because the most well-liked method of enjoyable operational wishes.

Show description

Read Online or Download Evolutionary Acquisition: Implementation Challenges for Major Defense Space Programs PDF

Best aerospace equipment books

Defending Space by Clayton Chun, Chris Taylor PDF

The us has been constructing house for a few years, and satellites give you the US army with an exceptional virtue over adversaries. Constellations of either army and civilian satellites supply safeguard and help for army operations, bring ballistic missile early caution, offer trustworthy, safe and jam-proof communications, assemble audio-visual amd digital intelligence, expect climate styles, advisor navigation, goal guns, and practice a number of different missions.

Sustainable City Regions:: Space, Place and Governance by Tetsuo Kidokoro, Noboru Harata, L.P. Subanu, J. Jessen, A. PDF

How should still neighborhood towns advance neighborhood improvement ideas for his or her sustainable destiny? How can such options paintings successfully? local towns at the moment are at a crossroads: will they refuse or be regenerated less than the affects of globalization? Their sustainable regeneration as artistic local facilities will play a decisive function of their sustainable improvement as a complete, yet in basic terms with plausible neighborhood spatial concepts that develop the community of towns and their hinterlands.

Extra info for Evolutionary Acquisition: Implementation Challenges for Major Defense Space Programs

Sample text

1 from October 2000 and other 5000 series regulations, and the second provided interim guidance and directed preparation of revised regulations within four months (Wolfowitz, 2002). These memoranda were followed by extensive discussion and debate among all the major stakeholders involved in defense acquisition. The intensity of that debate and the number of process issues that needed to be addressed delayed approval of the revised acquisition regulations for many months. Much of the discussion revolved around issues related to EA.

Also see Defense Acquisition University (2003). NOTES: NSS = National Space Strategy; NMS = National Military Strategy; DOTMLPF = doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership and education, personnel and facilities; ICD = initial capabilities document; CD = concept decision; AoA = analysis of alternatives; CDD = capability development document; CPD = capability production document; DAB = Defense Acquisition Board; JROC = Joint Requirements Oversight Council. 4 shows how the structuring of the overall acquisition program, as well as each discrete EA increment, were changed by the revised 5000 series in order to further implement these policies.

Finally, many if not most of the old regulatory requirements, which were usually waived in ACTD programs and other innovative approaches, appeared to some observers to have remained embedded in the new revised 5000 series regulations, which seemed to conflict with the basic goals of acquisition reform. As ably documented by Richard Sylvester and Joseph Ferrara among others (Sylvester and Ferrara, 2003), the adoption of strategies related to EA has been advocated by various DoD and other studies for at least twenty years.

Download PDF sample

Evolutionary Acquisition: Implementation Challenges for Major Defense Space Programs by Mark A. Lorell Julia Lowell Obaid Younossi

by Robert

Rated 5.00 of 5 – based on 49 votes