By Edmund A. M. Neugebauer, Stefan Sauerland, Abe Fingerhut, Bertrand Millat, Gerhard F. Buess
Best ecu laparoscopic surgeons have compiled the strategies of the ecu organization for Endoscopic surgical procedure (EAES) during this booklet. All statements are dependent not just at the specialists' evaluations, but additionally on a proper overview of the clinical literature. This paintings permits readers to realize an outline of leading edge surgical learn. All concepts describe precisely the confirmed good thing about every one surgery and method. such a lot directions comprise key statements. All chapters keep on with a based structure to permit speedy identity of all ideas. In precis, this paintings presents an ideal assessment of the achievements in laparoscopic surgical procedure during the final decade.
Read Online or Download EAES Guidelines for Endoscopic Surgery PDF
Similar obstetrics & gynecology books
Addresses new techniques and theories in illness regulate and gives the newest remedy modalities. devoted to new advancements within the scientific and surgery of endometriosis, this reference delves into present administration controversies, examines rising healing recommendations, and assists experts within the layout of recent investigations and learn paths for the research of this universal situation.
Indicating a turning aspect for the longer term remedy of uterine fibroids, this examine compares and contrasts traditional surgical remedies with the quick emergence of uterine artery embolization instead and not more invasive technique. Uterine fibroids, universal benign tumors of the uterus and pelvis, are the one commonest explanation for surgical procedure in girls except childbirth.
Offers the purposes of MRI in obstetrics and gynaecology in an in depth, but functional means
Reviewing the elemental technological know-how and invasive strategies for either diagnostic and healing obstetric and perinatal systems, this up to date textual content explores the massive development remodeled the 13 years because the earlier version was once released.
Extra info for EAES Guidelines for Endoscopic Surgery
Korolija et al. Here we provide some general remarks on QoL assessment in clinical and research settings. First, it should be kept in mind that no single QoL measure is ideal for all diseases or patient groups or settings. This implies that all instruments must be checked carefully for the psychometric properties in the context of endoscopic surgery. Occasionally, it may be necessary to extend existing instruments to fit the scope of a specific clinical problem or patient group, but only the reporting of standard measures allows readers to compare results across studies.
In a prospective controlled study of 31 patients, Plaisier  reported NHP data for the 3-, 6-, and 12-month intervals after surgery (2b). A significant difference in favor of laparoscopic surgery was found 6 months after cholecystectomy, but this difference vanished after 1 year with the exception of questions related to nausea, stomach swelling, and fatty food avoidance. A study from China also confirmed that GIQLI scores were initially better after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but Chen et al.
QoL was better in the laparoscopic group both 1 and 6 weeks after surgery. The differences were significant for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, social functioning. In a smaller third trial of only 53 patients, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP)  and the Pain-O-Meter  were applied to compare the 6week results after TAPP or Lichtenstein repair (1b) . The laparoscopic group had less pain postoperatively and returned to work earlier, but the differences were not significant.
EAES Guidelines for Endoscopic Surgery by Edmund A. M. Neugebauer, Stefan Sauerland, Abe Fingerhut, Bertrand Millat, Gerhard F. Buess