Download e-book for iPad: Bridging the gap between Aristotle's science and ethics by Devin Henry, Karen Margrethe Nielsen

By Devin Henry, Karen Margrethe Nielsen

ISBN-10: 1107010365

ISBN-13: 9781107010369

This ebook consolidates rising examine on Aristotle's technological know-how and ethics that allows you to discover the level to which the options, equipment, and practices he constructed for clinical inquiry and clarification are used to enquire ethical phenomena. every one bankruptcy exhibits, otherwise, that Aristotle's ethics is far extra like a technology than it truly is mostly represented. The upshot of this is often twofold. First, uncovering the hyperlinks among Aristotle's technology and ethics can provide to open up new and leading edge instructions for study into his ethical philosophy. moment, exhibiting why Aristotle thinks ethics can by no means be totally assimilated to the version of technology can help shed new gentle on his perspectives in regards to the limits of technological know-how. the amount hence provides to make an important contribution to our realizing of the epistemological, metaphysical, and mental foundations of Aristotle's ethics

Show description

Read Online or Download Bridging the gap between Aristotle's science and ethics PDF

Best greek & roman books

Plato and his Predecessors: The Dramatisation of Reason (The by Mary Margaret McCabe PDF

Plato and his Predecessors considers how Plato represents his philosophical predecessors in a past due quartet of dialogues: the Theaetetus, the Sophist, the Politicus and the Philebus. those predecessors look in imaginary conversations; and they're refuted after they fail to shield their philosophical positions in debate.

Read e-book online Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics (Clarendon Paperbacks) PDF

The connection among Seneca's prose works and his profession as a first-century Roman statesman is difficult, for whereas he writes within the first individual, he tells little of his exterior lifestyles or of the folks and occasions that shaped its atmosphere. during this booklet, Miriam Griffin addresses the matter through first reconstructing Seneca's profession utilizing in basic terms open air resources and his de Clementia and Apocolocyntosis.

Download PDF by Devin Henry, Karen Margrethe Nielsen: Bridging the gap between Aristotle's science and ethics

This ebook consolidates rising examine on Aristotle's technology and ethics for you to discover the level to which the recommendations, equipment, and practices he constructed for medical inquiry and rationalization are used to enquire ethical phenomena. every one bankruptcy exhibits, otherwise, that Aristotle's ethics is far extra like a technological know-how than it really is regularly represented.

Additional info for Bridging the gap between Aristotle's science and ethics

Sample text

For it is impossible to discuss them at all from principles proper to the particular science in hand, seeing that the principles are primitive in relation to everything else: it is through reputable opinions about them that these have to be discussed, and this task belongs properly, or most appropriately, to dialectic; for dialectic is a process of criticism wherein lies the path to the principles of all enquiries’ (Top. 101a25–27; 34b4) transl. ROT (amended). For a discussion of Aristotle’s dialectical method that diverges from the one sketched here, see Karbowski, Chapter 5.

It has a further use in relation to the principles in each science. For it is impossible to discuss them at all from principles proper to the particular science in hand, seeing that the principles are primitive in relation to everything else: it is through reputable opinions about them that these have to be discussed, and this task belongs properly, or most appropriately, to dialectic; for dialectic is a process of criticism wherein lies the path to the principles of all enquiries’ (Top. 101a25–27; 34b4) transl.

Irwin notes that while Aristotle sometimes reverts to a statistical notion of the usual, where ‘x is usually F’ means that most but not all xs are F, the dominant sense is normative. Thus ‘x is usually F’ means that, though xs may be prevented from being F by impediments of a circumstantial or material kind, in the absence of such impediments xs are F. This means that there is a per se relationship between being an x and having the property F, though the relationship is defeasible. For a critical examination of Irwin’s claims, see Henry, Chapter 8.

Download PDF sample

Bridging the gap between Aristotle's science and ethics by Devin Henry, Karen Margrethe Nielsen


by Anthony
4.2

Rated 4.12 of 5 – based on 48 votes